Promoting Sports & Fitness
Participation and Industry Vitality

SFIA Products and Services

Federal Judge Rules No Infringement In Protective Headband Patent Case

Date: 7/21/10

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Bill Shralow (856) 616-2691 wshralow@archerlaw.com  

Brain-Pad contact: Alicia Buonanno (610) 228-2096 Alicia@Gregoryfca.com                                    

Federal Judge Rules No Infringement In Protective Headband Patent Case              

Conshohocken, PA —July 16, 2010—Brain-Pad Inc., maker of mouth guards and other protective products that reduce sports injuries, did not infringe on a competitor’s patent by designing and selling its own impact-protective headbands, a federal judge has ruled.              

In dismissing all nine patent-infringement claims against Brain-Pad, Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware ruled that the competitor companies, Innovative Patents LLC and Forcefield LLC of Hackensack, N.J., failed to show that Brain-Pad’s design infringes on the competitor’s patent, and that Brain-Pad may continue to sell the specialized headbands with impact-absorbing inserts.              

In obtaining summary judgment, Brain-Pad’s lawyers from Archer & Greiner also highlighted the history of the patent in question. The legal team - Partners John C. Connell, John F. Letchford, and Charles J. Brown III, along with Associate Stephanie A. Gannon - showed that the original application was amended three times to overcome rejection by the patent examiner because of already-existing patents. The final version, tailored to secure patentability, contains features that are substantively distinct from the Brain-Pad design, Judge Thynge ruled.   Thus, Brain-Pad was found not to infringe either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, which bars designs with only minor departures made simply to defeat literal patent protection. Judge Thynge’s ruling of summary judgment also rejected the competitor’s demand that Brain-Pad pay triple damages based on alleged losses from infringement.   “We are thrilled to finally have the opportunity to reintroduce our impact protective headband to both retailers and consumers after winning this lengthy legal challenge,” says Joe Manzo, President of Brain-Pad. “It could not be a better time for a protective heard gear product. Head injuries are a concern for all athletes as the number of sports concussions continue to rise. Our products are designed to lower the risk of dangerous head injuries in contact sports. The impact protective headband along with our innovative line of dual-arch mouth guards give sports players full head protection during the game.”  

Brain-Pad, based in Conshohocken, Pa., was founded in 1995 to promote, manufacture and distribute customized dual-arch mouth guards designed to reduce the risk of concussion from lower jaw impacts while increasing endurance and performance. The company has become a leader in technology development in the sports impact-protection field, with products available in retail and wholesale outlets as well as through distributors, sports leagues, professional organizations, and school teams at the intermediate, high-school, college and university levels.   If you have questions about either the impact of this ruling or other intellectual property matters, please contact John C. Connell or John F. Letchford of Archer & Greiner’s Intellectual Property Group at (856) 795-2121.   

Archer & Greiner, P.C., is a full-service law firm with more than 175 lawyers serving Fortune 100 clients, small to medium-sized businesses and individuals for more than 80 years. The firm has offices in Haddonfield, Princeton and Flemington, N.J.; Philadelphia, Pa.; New York, N.Y.;  and Wilmington and Georgetown, Del. For more information, visit www.archerlaw.com.   # # #

Copyright © 2021 SFIA • All Rights Reserved

Subscribe to Our SFIA Weekly E-Mail List

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

No, thanks